PDA

View Full Version : Port Plugging with "Max Output" EQ setting


OU812
December 29th, 2005, 8:25 AM
I have a question for all STF-3, VTF-3 MKII, VTF-2 MKII owners.

Has anybody tried running the sub with one port plugged and the EQ set for "Max Output"? If so, did you like the results?

Dr. Hsu has been asked about plugging one port on the STF-3 and this is what he had to say:

"Our company tries to respond quickly to customer needs. This issue of getting high output below 25 Hz is a good example. Previously, we felt that the majority of customers who buy the STF-3 do not need response below 25 Hz. Posts like yours make us reconsider that. We came out with a very simple and cost effective solution to make the STF-3 more appealing to consumers like yourself – plug up one port. The fact that our manual did not mention the option does not mean that one cannot do it or that it is not recommended. It is a different story if we said specifically in the manual that we do not recommend operating the subwoofer in that fashion.

The loss in output with 10% harmonic distortion when switching to one port is not as bad as you think. Thanks to the soft power supply of the BASH amp, with one port open, the impedance at 25 Hz is much higher than when both ports are open. With both ports open, the impedance at 25 Hz is very low. The maximum voltage swing the amplifier can deliver is much lower than when one port is open, where the low impedance is shifted down to around 18 Hz. The result is no loss of output at 25 Hz for 10% harmonic distortion. The woofer has a much higher excursion at that SPL compared to the two port open case (roughly 10 times higher), but harmonic distortion is still below 10% up to the same SPL. The only 1/3 octave spaced frequency measured that showed significant reduction in output with the 10% harmonic distortion criteria is 31.5 Hz where we measured a 2 dB reduction.

Regarding frequency response, using one port versus two ports and not adjusting the EQ is roughly equivalent to comparing a sealed box system with a system Q of 0.7 to one with a system Q of 0.5. The frequency response starts to roll off earlier. In this case, the roll off begins at around 40 Hz, being down about 2 dB by 25 Hz compared to both ports open. However, Edward’s expectation of the frequency response being down 7 dB at 20 Hz compared to the two ports open situation is erroneous. Edwards forgot that with both ports open, below 25 Hz, the output of the port gets out of phase with respect to the woofer output. This result in a 24 dB/Oct acoustic roll off below 25 Hz. This is absent in the one port open condition, down to the single port resonance of around 18 Hz. This means that the roll off rate between 25 and 18 Hz is far gentler with one port open. The result is the frequency response at 20 Hz is down less with one port open than with both ports open, even without changing the EQ.

Now, some customers do prefer an overdamped frequency response. Some feel that it gives a ‘tighter’ bass. Hence I would not dismiss this option entirely. In fact, I will make it official that customers who prefer an overdamped characteristic can set their VTF-3 or VTF-2 to two ports open EQ, and plug up one port. It posts no danger to the subwoofer (on the other hand, we do NOT recommend opening both ports and setting the EQ to one port open)."

lradden
December 29th, 2005, 11:44 AM
Very interesting. I wonder how low a VTF-3 MK2 with one port open and set to max output would play? A VTF-3 MK2 will currently play down to 16Hz before the steep drop off occurs. I wonder what Hz it would play down to with one port open and max output, 14Hz maybe?

OU812
December 29th, 2005, 12:51 PM
Very interesting. I wonder how low a VTF-3 MK2 with one port open and set to max output would play? A VTF-3 MK2 will currently play down to 16Hz before the steep drop off occurs. I wonder what Hz it would play down to with one port open and max output, 14Hz maybe?

I am wondering too. If I understood Dr. Hsu correctly, the roll-off in the 25Hz to 18Hz is slower with EQ set to Max Output and 1 port open, therefore giving a sense of "tighter" deep bass (20Hz and under...).

Well, I guess is time to "play around" with my VTF3-MK II and find out.


BTW, nice picture of you A/V rack. Which Rotel amps do you own?

lradden
December 29th, 2005, 1:38 PM
Sanme here I'll have to play with my VTF3s tonight and see how things sound/feel with some really bassy stuff. Thanks for the compliments on the rack. My amps are a RMB1095(200x5) and a RB1050(70x2). I think I have some better pics of them here, can't quite remember it's been a while and I can't get to my site from work right now.http://pages.cthome.net/lradden/ht/theater.htm

OU812
December 29th, 2005, 2:27 PM
Man, lradden! That's one heck of a dedicated theater room you have. Dual VTF3's, yeez!! You must get some serious SPL in that room. I have one VTF3 in a 15' x 23' x 8' room and its more than my ears (and neighbors...) can tolerate.

Looks like you have a Sherwood NewCastle P965 processor. Is that correct?

Are your speakers Monitor Audios?

Going back to the topic, my concern is whether or not the setting in question would generate more port turbulence noise at reference levels.

Macdog
December 29th, 2005, 6:36 PM
STF-3 with one port plugged goes down to 18hz. I don't remember what it was doing at 16hz. I'll have to go look it up.

OU812
December 30th, 2005, 6:01 AM
McDog,

Was there increased port turbulence noise at any point when you played at loud levels?

Did you get a sense of "tight bass" in the low octave?

Lastly, are you still using your STF-3 with 1 port open or did you go back to the "standard" setting.

Pete_Hsu
December 30th, 2005, 9:08 AM
Dear OU812,

By plugging a port and reducing port flow area (by 50% in this case), there is always a greater chance of port turbulence-related noise at high output levels. This method of port-plugging to lower the tune is effective, but still has the tradeoff in that port flow area is significantly reduced. Turbocharger is a very effective way to get around this issue, since maximum port flow area is maintained at the same time that port tuning is lowered.

Sincerely,

OU812
December 30th, 2005, 11:40 AM
Thanks for the clarification, Peter!

One question for you. I've seen you have given an estimated release date for HO subwoofers early January. Will the "turbocharger" add-in units be available in January as well?

Pete_Hsu
December 30th, 2005, 11:54 AM
My pleasure OU812!

I would say that the turbocharger units will be ready when the VTF-3 HO is ready. There may be some people who receive the 3HO in January, but it will probably be February at the earliest before people who order now receive the 3HO. :(

Thank you all again for hanging in there!

Sincerely,

Macdog
December 31st, 2005, 10:16 AM
McDog,

Was there increased port turbulence noise at any point when you played at loud levels?

Did you get a sense of "tight bass" in the low octave?

Lastly, are you still using your STF-3 with 1 port open or did you go back to the "standard" setting.

I don't usually get crazy loud, so I haven't noticed any port turbulence. I've kept it with 1 port plugged becuase the bass does seem "tighter." I can't remember exactly, but I've been able to 80+ dB at 16hz with a port plugged. After the turbo comes out, I'll probably get the amp modified and throw a turbo on it. I'm hoping the turbo will add the same sense of tightness I get with a port plugged and allow me to keep both open.

wuchi
January 3rd, 2006, 6:52 PM
Sanme here I'll have to play with my VTF3s tonight and see how things sound/feel with some really bassy stuff. Thanks for the compliments on the rack. My amps are a RMB1095(200x5) and a RB1050(70x2). I think I have some better pics of them here, can't quite remember it's been a while and I can't get to my site from work right now.http://pages.cthome.net/lradden/ht/theater.htm


Iradden,

That is a very nice set-up, congratulations!

lradden
January 5th, 2006, 7:27 PM
Man, lradden! That's one heck of a dedicated theater room you have. Dual VTF3's, yeez!! You must get some serious SPL in that room. I have one VTF3 in a 15' x 23' x 8' room and its more than my ears (and neighbors...) can tolerate.

Looks like you have a Sherwood NewCastle P965 processor. Is that correct?

Are your speakers Monitor Audios?

Going back to the topic, my concern is whether or not the setting in question would generate more port turbulence noise at reference levels.

Man you're goodhttp://www.hsuresearch.com/forum/images/smilies/cool.gif, those are Monitor Audio Silver s10 and the pre amp is a Sherwood P-965. My room is 13x24 and the duals really rock the place. If the HO lives up to it's billing then I'll probably be replacing my dual VTF-3 MIIs with dual VTF3HO + turbos, but I'm not sure if the walls can take it.

Iradden,

That is a very nice set-up, congratulations!

Thanks to both of you for the nice comments.
Legairre

OU812
January 6th, 2006, 8:37 AM
lradden

Dual VTF3-HO's with Turbocharger? I could only imagine. I have one VTF3-MKII on a 15' x 23' x 8' dedicated room which opens up to the rest of the house (2-story, HT room located upstairs...) and while watching the "tripod" scene (chapter 5) of War of the Worlds, I feel the roof is going to blast off.

There has been a lot of talk about the LFE in this movie over at AVS forums, people complaining about their subwoofers bottoming out on chapter 5. I truly believe most of them are running their subs "hot", even when they are claiming to be properly calibrated. I've played this particular chapter pretty loud and my VTF3-MKII plays it perfectly (clean, loud, and low...)

You could try getting the TurboCharger attachment for each of your VTF3's first. See how you like that. Then, if you feel your room can handle it, upgrade to the VTF3-HO's.