HSU main speakers?

[rbuszka]

I like what I'm seeing from you guys at HSU, with your VTF and STF subwoofers and VT-12 speaker package. I think you should start to develop a set of high fidelity speakers. If I were in charge, here's what I'd do:

STS-1
Bookshelf 2-way minimonitor to match STF-series subs: 5.25" polypropylene cone midbass, rear-facing 5.25" passive radiator (for deeper tuning in a small enclosure), and a 1" ceramic-powered silk dome tweeter.

STS-2
Floorstanding 2.5-way loudspeaker to match STF-series subs: 5.25" polypropylene cone midbass and bass drivers, three front-firing 5.25" passive radiators for reflex loading (these would be located below the midbasses and tweeter), and a 1" ceramic-powered silk dome tweeter.

VTS-1
Bookshelf 2-way monitor to match VTF-3 subwoofers: 6.5" polypropylene cone midbass, rear-facing 6.5" passive radiator (for deeper tuning in a small enclosure), and a 1" neodymium-powered dome tweeter of some type.

VTS-2
Floorstanding powered-tower loudspeaker with two-way passive section: 6.5" polypropylene-cone midbass, rear-facing 6.5" passive radiator, and a 1" neodymium-powered dome tweeter of some type. There would be a separate section containing a powered 8" woofer (basically an STF-8 in a tower) and a rear-facing port.

[tdekany]

Hsu will be coming out with larger speakers

[Dudley]

Larger speakers would be nice. My first choice would be a 5-1/4 woofer 2 way with compact dimensions and good bass down to 80 Hz. If their relationship with BIC remains they could base it off of the DV 52si (and massage it a little for better sound) but give it a much nicer cabinet.

[Lwang]

I thought Hsu was particular to multi-axial driver speakers, dino-horns and Quads. Why would he design speakers that he has no particular affinity to?

[Newbie 13]

I thought Hsu was particular to multi-axial driver speakers, dino-horns and Quads. Why would he design speakers that he has no particular affinity to?

Consumer demands?